Plastics Materials (Part 10): In-depth Analysis of POM (Polyoxymethylene)
Time:2026-11-07 08:27:15 / Popularity: / Source:
For previous reading, please refer to Plastic Materials (Part 9): In-depth Analysis of PEHD & PMMA.
POM (Polyoxymethylene), commonly known as "acetal," is the most rigid and wear-resistant of five major engineering plastics—combining high rigidity, high wear resistance, and high fatigue resistance, earning it title of "metal among plastics." POM boasts a tensile strength of 60-70 MPa and a flexural modulus of 2500-3200 MPa, approaching metal levels; its coefficient of friction is as low as 0.1-0.3, exhibiting excellent self-lubricating properties; and its fatigue resistance ranks among the best in plastics, capable of withstanding millions of cycles without failure.
With these unique properties, POM occupies an irreplaceable position in gears, bearings, fuel systems, precision components, and other fields.
POM (Polyoxymethylene), commonly known as "acetal," is the most rigid and wear-resistant of five major engineering plastics—combining high rigidity, high wear resistance, and high fatigue resistance, earning it title of "metal among plastics." POM boasts a tensile strength of 60-70 MPa and a flexural modulus of 2500-3200 MPa, approaching metal levels; its coefficient of friction is as low as 0.1-0.3, exhibiting excellent self-lubricating properties; and its fatigue resistance ranks among the best in plastics, capable of withstanding millions of cycles without failure.
With these unique properties, POM occupies an irreplaceable position in gears, bearings, fuel systems, precision components, and other fields.
I. What is POM? One picture to understand
POM = Polyoxymethylene, a semi-crystalline thermoplastic plastic polymerized from formaldehyde. Its molecular backbone consists of repeating -CH₂-O- units:
| Components | Function | Property Contribution |
| -CH2-O- Backbone | Molecular Backbone | High rigidity, high crystallinity, wear resistance |
| Crystalline Region | Ordered Folded Chain | High strength, high rigidity, heat resistance, chemical resistance |
| Amorphous Region | Random Molecular Chain | Toughness, impact resistance |
Core characteristics of POM: High crystallinity (70~85%) → High rigidity, high strength, and excellent wear resistance; Regular molecular chain structure → High fatigue resistance, low friction, and self-lubrication.
POM's superior properties stem from its unique molecular structure: High crystallinity → High rigidity, high strength, high heat resistance, and excellent chemical resistance; Regular molecular chains → High fatigue resistance, low friction, and self-lubrication; High density (1.41 g/cm³) → High specific strength and high specific stiffness; Ether bond structure → Easily thermally degraded (requires stabilizers)
Main classifications of POM
POM's superior properties stem from its unique molecular structure: High crystallinity → High rigidity, high strength, high heat resistance, and excellent chemical resistance; Regular molecular chains → High fatigue resistance, low friction, and self-lubrication; High density (1.41 g/cm³) → High specific strength and high specific stiffness; Ether bond structure → Easily thermally degraded (requires stabilizers)
Main classifications of POM
| Types | Features | Core Properties | Typical Applications |
| Homopolymer POM (POM-H) | High crystallinity, high strength, poor thermal stability | Higher strength, higher modulus, more abrasion resistant | Gears, bearings, high-strength parts |
| Copolymer POM (POM-C) | Good thermal stability, good chemical resistance, slightly lower strength | Good thermal stability, hydrolysis resistance, alkali resistance | General-purpose parts, fuel systems |
| High Flow Grade | Low viscosity, high flow | Easy to process, thin-wall molding | Precision small parts, complex structures |
| High Impact Grade | Toughened and modified, good impact resistance | High impact resistance, low-temperature toughness | Snap-fits, safety parts, fuel systems |
| Abrasion/Low Friction Grade | Added PTFE/Silicone Oil/Molybdenum Disulfide | Ultra-low friction, high abrasion resistance | High-speed gears, sliding parts |
| Glass Fiber Reinforced Grade | Glass fiber filler, high rigidity and high heat resistance | Double modulus, improved HDT | Structural parts, high load-bearing parts |
| Conductive and Antistatic Grade | Added carbon black/carbon fiber | Conductive, antistatic | Electronics, fuel systems |
Homopolymer vs. Copolymer: Homopolymer POM (such as DuPont Delrin) has higher strength and modulus, but poorer thermal stability and chemical resistance; copolymer POM (such as Celcon, Hostaform) has better thermal stability and hydrolysis resistance, and is safer to process, making it mainstream in the market.
POM vs. PA66 vs. PBT: How to choose engineering plastics?
POM vs. PA66 vs. PBT: How to choose engineering plastics?
| Comparison Dimensions | POM | PA66 (Nylon) | PBT |
| Density | 1.41 g/cm3 | 1.14 g/cm3 | 1.31 g/cm3 |
| Tensile Strength | 60~70 MPa | 70~85 MPa (Dry) | 50-60 MPa |
| Flexural Modulus | 2500~3200 MPa | 2500~3000 MPa (Dry) | 2200~2800 MPa |
| Notched Impact | 6~10 kJ/m2 | 5~15 kJ/m2 (Dry) | 4~8 kJ/m2 |
| Heat Deflection Temperature | 95~110℃ | 70~90℃ (Dry) | 55~70℃ |
| Abrasion Resistance | Excellent (Self-lubricating) | Good | Average |
| Fatigue Resistance | Excellent | Good | Average |
| Moisture Absorption | Very Low (<0.2%) | High (~9%) | Low (~0.2%) |
| Dimensional Stability | Excellent | Poor (Water Absorption Deformation) | Good |
| Chemical Resistance | Good (Oil and Solvent Resistant) | Good (Oil Resistant) | Good |
| Cost | Medium-High | Medium | Medium |
Selection logic: For wear resistance + fatigue resistance + dimensional stability, choose POM; for high strength + impact resistance, choose nylon; for electrical insulation + dimensional stability, choose PBT.
II. Mechanical Properties and Yield-to-Tension Ratio
POM exhibits unique mechanical properties among engineering plastics—high rigidity, high strength, high wear resistance, and high fatigue resistance.
| Properties | General Purpose Grade (M90) | Impact Grade (S9364) | Glass fiber reinforced 30% | Abrasion resistant grade | Test Standards |
| Density | 1.41 g/cm³ | 1.37 g/cm³ | 1.55~1.60g/cm³ | 1.40~1.45g/cm³ | ISO 1183 |
| Tensile Strength | 65 MPa | ~43 MPa | 100~130MPa | 50~60 MPa | ISO 527 |
| Tensile Modulus | 2760 MPa | ~1650 MPa | 7000~9000MPa | 2200~2600MPa | ISO 527 |
| Elongation at Break | 10~35% | -16%+ | 2~5% | 5~15% | ISO 527 |
| Flexural Modulus | 2550 MPa | ~1550 MPa | 6000-8000MPa | 2000~2400MPa | ISO 527 |
| Flexural Strength | -80 MPa | ~55 MPa | 130~160MPa | 70~80 MPa | ISO 178 |
| Notched Izod Impact (23℃) | 6~8 kJ/m² | ~20 kJ/m² | 8~12 kJ/m² | 5~8 kJ/m² | ISO 178 |
| Heat Deflection Temperature (1.8 MPa) | 95~105℃ | ~85~95℃ | 150~165℃ | 90~100℃ | ISO 180 |
| Vicat Softening Temperature | 140~150℃ | ~130~140℃ | 160~170℃ | 135~145℃ | ISO 75 |
| Melting Point | 165~175℃ | ~165℃ | 165~175℃ | 165℃ | ISO 306 |
| Molding Shrinkage | 1.8~2.4% | 1.5~2.0% | 0.5~1.0% | 1.8~2.2% | ISO 3146 |
| Coefficient of Friction | 0.2~0.3 | 0.2~0.3 | 0.25~0.35 | 0.05~0.15 | ISO 294-4 |
Comparison of Typical Properties of Different Types of POM
Note: Above are typical ranges for materials of same grade. Specific values may vary depending on molecular weight, toughening agent content, and additives.
Yield-to-tensile strength ratio analysis: POM's yield-to-tensile strength ratio (yield strength/tensile strength) has following characteristics: General Purpose Grade: High yield-to-tensile strength ratio (~0.9~0.95), with a distinct yield point, some cold drawing after yielding, and moderate elongation at break (10~35%). Impact Grade: High yield-to-tensile strength ratio, even greater elongation after yielding (15~20%+), and better toughness. Glass Fiber Reinforced Grade: Even higher yield-to-tensile strength ratio (~0.95+), direct brittle fracture, and very low elongation at break. Abrasion-Resistant Grade: High yield-to-tensile strength ratio, but slightly lower strength and modulus due to lubricant influence.
Engineering Conclusion: POM is a typical rigid material—high rigidity, high strength, with a distinct yield point, some plastic deformation after yielding. Its fatigue resistance is the best among plastics, making it suitable for cyclic loading applications. However, it is highly notch sensitive; therefore, fillet radius and stress concentration must be carefully considered during design.
Influence of Temperature on Performance
POM's properties are quite sensitive to temperature: Impact Strength: Moderate at room temperature (6~8 kJ/m² notch), decreases significantly at low temperatures, but impact-grade POM maintains good toughness at low temperatures. Stiffness: Decreases with increasing temperature, HDT (1.8MPa) approximately 95~105℃, long-term service temperature approximately 80~100℃. Creep: POM's creep resistance is relatively good among engineering plastics, but creep still occurs under long-term loads, becoming more pronounced at high temperatures. Fatigue: POM has excellent fatigue resistance, among the best of all thermoplastics, with fatigue strength reaching 25~30% of tensile strength at room temperature.
Note: Above are typical ranges for materials of same grade. Specific values may vary depending on molecular weight, toughening agent content, and additives.
Yield-to-tensile strength ratio analysis: POM's yield-to-tensile strength ratio (yield strength/tensile strength) has following characteristics: General Purpose Grade: High yield-to-tensile strength ratio (~0.9~0.95), with a distinct yield point, some cold drawing after yielding, and moderate elongation at break (10~35%). Impact Grade: High yield-to-tensile strength ratio, even greater elongation after yielding (15~20%+), and better toughness. Glass Fiber Reinforced Grade: Even higher yield-to-tensile strength ratio (~0.95+), direct brittle fracture, and very low elongation at break. Abrasion-Resistant Grade: High yield-to-tensile strength ratio, but slightly lower strength and modulus due to lubricant influence.
Engineering Conclusion: POM is a typical rigid material—high rigidity, high strength, with a distinct yield point, some plastic deformation after yielding. Its fatigue resistance is the best among plastics, making it suitable for cyclic loading applications. However, it is highly notch sensitive; therefore, fillet radius and stress concentration must be carefully considered during design.
Influence of Temperature on Performance
POM's properties are quite sensitive to temperature: Impact Strength: Moderate at room temperature (6~8 kJ/m² notch), decreases significantly at low temperatures, but impact-grade POM maintains good toughness at low temperatures. Stiffness: Decreases with increasing temperature, HDT (1.8MPa) approximately 95~105℃, long-term service temperature approximately 80~100℃. Creep: POM's creep resistance is relatively good among engineering plastics, but creep still occurs under long-term loads, becoming more pronounced at high temperatures. Fatigue: POM has excellent fatigue resistance, among the best of all thermoplastics, with fatigue strength reaching 25~30% of tensile strength at room temperature.
III. Application Overview
POM has a wide range of applications, appearing in almost all fields requiring precision, wear resistance, and fatigue resistance.
Automotive Applications
Automotive Applications
| Components | Common grades | Key requirements |
| Fuel pump impeller/housing | General grade/Impact-resistant grade/Conductive grade | Fuel resistance, abrasion resistance, low friction, conductivity (antistatic) |
| Fuel tank float/sensor | General grade/Impact-resistant grade | Fuel resistance, dimensional stability, fatigue resistance |
| Door lock mechanism/actuator | General grade/Abrasion-resistant grade | Abrasion resistance, fatigue resistance, low noise |
| Seat adjustment gear | General grade/Abrasion-resistant grade | Abrasion resistance, fatigue resistance, high load capacity |
| Window regulator gear | General grade/Abrasion-resistant grade | Abrasion resistance, fatigue resistance, low noise |
| Windshield wiper gear/linkage | General grade | Fatigue resistance, abrasion resistance, weather resistance |
| Throttle body/sensor | General grade/Abrasion-resistant grade | Precision, abrasion resistance, dimensional stability |
| Snap fasteners | Impact-resistant grade | High impact resistance, good toughness, easy assembly |
Fuel systems are a key application of POM in automobiles. Combination of POM's fuel resistance, low friction, and fatigue resistance makes it preferred material for fuel pump impellers, gears, and sensors. Conductive POM can meet anti-static requirements of fuel systems.
Electronic and Electrical Applications
Electronic and Electrical Applications
| Products | Common Grades | Key Requirements |
| Printer/Copier Gears | General Purpose/Abrasion Resistant Grade | Abrasion Resistant, Fatigue Resistant, Low Noise, Precision |
| Keyboard Buttons/Switches | General Purpose | Fatigue Resistant, Good Hand Feel, Long Lifespan |
| Connectors/Terminals | General Purpose | Dimensional Stability, Insulation, Precision |
| Motor Brushes/Bearings | Abrasion Resistant Grade | Low Friction, High Abrasion Resistant, Long Lifespan |
| Clocks/Precision Mechanisms | General Purpose/High Flow Grade | Precision, Dimensional Stability, Fatigue Resistant |
| DVD/Optical Drive Mechanisms | General Purpose/Abrasion Resistant Grade | Precision, Abrasion Resistant, Low Noise |
Industrial and Mechanical Applications
| Products | Common grades | Key requirements |
| Gears/worm gears | General grade/Abrasion-resistant grade | Abrasion-resistant, fatigue-resistant, low noise |
| Bearings/sleeves | Abrasion-resistant grade/General grade | Low friction, high wear resistance, self-lubricating |
| Cams/sliders | Abrasion-resistant grade/General grade | Abrasion-resistant, fatigue-resistant, low friction |
| Valve/pump bodies | General grade/Impact-resistant grade | Chemical resistance, dimensional stability, good sealing |
| Springs/fasteners | General grade | High elasticity, fatigue resistance, high strength |
| Conveyor chains | General grade/Abrasion-resistant grade | Abrasion-resistant, fatigue-resistant, corrosion-resistant |
Other Applications
| Applications | Typical Products | Core Advantages |
| Daily Necessities | Zippers, Buttons, Lighters | Abrasion-resistant, fatigue-resistant, low-cost |
| Medical | Insulin Pens, Inhalers | Precision, fatigue-resistant, sterilizable |
| Construction | Door and Window Hardware, Pipe Fittings | Abrasion-resistant, corrosion-resistant, low-friction |
| Food | Food Processing Machinery, Beverage Valves | Food-grade, fatigue-resistant, chemical-resistant |
| Sports Equipment | Ski Bindings, Fishing Tackle | High strength, fatigue-resistant, abrasion-resistant |
IV. CAE Simulation
POM simulation modeling requires special attention to crystallization behavior, rate dependence, and fatigue.
Five Commonly Used Constitutive Models
Five Commonly Used Constitutive Models
| Models | Applicable scenarios | Features |
| Linear elasticity | Small deformation, stiffness analysis | Simplest, elastic modulus + Poisson's ratio |
| Elastic-plasticity | Strength analysis, large deformation | Consides yield and plastic deformation |
| Viscoelasticity/Viscoplasticity | Dynamic impact, creep | Consides strain rate and time effects |
| Fatigue model | Fatigue life prediction | Consides cyclic loading and fatigue |
| Temperature-dependent constitutive model | High/low temperature environment analysis | Performance varies greatly with temperature |
Four Key Points of POM Simulation: Strong Rate Dependence: Yield strength of POM increases significantly with increasing strain rate. Dynamic simulations such as collisions and drops must use rate-dependent constitutive models. Strong Temperature Sensitivity: Properties of POM vary greatly with temperature. From -40℃ to 100℃, modulus and strength may decrease by more than half. Simulations under temperature environments must consider temperature effects. Fatigue is Key: POM is most commonly used in cyclic loading applications (gears, bearings, etc.). Fatigue life prediction is focus of POM simulation. Fatigue models and S-N curves are required. Creep Cannot Be Ignored: POM exhibits significant creep under long-term loading, which is more pronounced at high temperatures. Creep needs to be considered for structural components subjected to long-term loads.
Typical Simulation Scenario
Typical Simulation Scenario
| Simulation Types | Model Used | Results to Analyze |
| Static Stiffness | Linear Elastic/Elastic-Plastic | Displacement, Stress Distribution |
| Modal/NVH | Linear Elastic | Natural Frequency, Mode Shape |
| Drop/Collision | Rate-Related Elastic-Plastic | Stress, Strain, Failure Mode |
| Creep/Relaxation | Viscoelastic/Creep Model | Long-Term Deformation, Stress Relaxation |
| Fatigue Life | Fatigue Model + S-N Curve | Fatigue Life, Safety Factor |
| Gear Contact | Elastic-Plastic + Contact | Contact Stress, Tooth Root Stress |
| Warpage Prediction | Thermo-Elastic-Plastic + Crystallization | Warpage, Residual Stress |
V. Six Major Failure Modes and Countermeasures
POM failure modes have unique characteristics; wear, fatigue, and thermal degradation are the most common problems.
1. Wear Failure
Problem: Long-term friction and wear lead to dimensional deviations, performance degradation, and increased noise. This is one of the most common failure modes of POM.
Common Scenarios: Gear tooth surface wear, bearing bushing wear, slider guide wear.
How to Solve:
Problem: Long-term friction and wear lead to dimensional deviations, performance degradation, and increased noise. This is one of the most common failure modes of POM.
Common Scenarios: Gear tooth surface wear, bearing bushing wear, slider guide wear.
How to Solve:
| Direction | Specific Practices |
| Materials | Select wear-resistant POM (with added PTFE/silicone oil/molybdenum disulfide) |
| Materials | Glass fiber reinforced POM (to improve hardness and wear resistance) |
| Design | Optimize contact area and pressure distribution |
| Design | Reasonable lubrication design (oil grooves, oil holes) |
| Design | Reduce PV value (pressure x speed) |
| Process | Improve surface finish |
| Use | Regular lubrication maintenance |
| Use | Avoid overload and high speed |
2. Fatigue Fracture
Problem: Under long-term cyclic loading, POM products suddenly fracture without significant plastic deformation. Although POM has good fatigue resistance, it will still fail if fatigue limit is exceeded.
Common Scenarios: Gear tooth root fatigue fracture, spring fatigue fracture, fatigue of structural components under cyclic load.
How to Solve:
Problem: Under long-term cyclic loading, POM products suddenly fracture without significant plastic deformation. Although POM has good fatigue resistance, it will still fail if fatigue limit is exceeded.
Common Scenarios: Gear tooth root fatigue fracture, spring fatigue fracture, fatigue of structural components under cyclic load.
How to Solve:
| Direction | Specific Practices |
| Materials | Select high-strength/high-fatigue-resistance grades |
| Materials | Homopolymer POM (slightly higher fatigue strength) |
| Design | Increase fillet radius to avoid stress concentration |
| Design | Reduce working stress and increase safety factor |
| Design | Optimize load distribution |
| Design | Avoid notches and scratches |
| Process | Optimize molding process to reduce internal stress and defects |
| Usage | Avoid overload and impact |
3. Thermal Degradation/Aging
Problem: At high temperatures, POM molecular chains break (depolymerization produces formaldehyde), leading to decreased strength, brittleness, and discoloration. This can occur during processing and use.
Common Scenarios: Degradation due to excessively high processing temperatures; aging due to prolonged high-temperature use; silver streaks and powdering on the product surface.
Solutions:
Problem: At high temperatures, POM molecular chains break (depolymerization produces formaldehyde), leading to decreased strength, brittleness, and discoloration. This can occur during processing and use.
Common Scenarios: Degradation due to excessively high processing temperatures; aging due to prolonged high-temperature use; silver streaks and powdering on the product surface.
Solutions:
| Direction | Specific Practices |
| Materials | Select copolymer POM with good thermal stability |
| Materials | Add antioxidants and heat stabilizers |
| Materials | Select aging-resistant POM |
| Design | Avoid prolonged high-temperature environments |
| Design | Reduce operating temperature |
| Process | Strictly control processing temperature (not exceeding 230℃) |
| Process | Shorten residence time of melt in barrel |
| Process | Cool down and clean material promptly when shutting down |
| Usage | Avoid prolonged high temperatures and direct sunlight |
4. Hydrolysis/Chemical Degradation
Problem: In high-temperature water or acid/alkali environments, POM molecular chains hydrolyze and break, leading to performance degradation. Copolymer POM has better hydrolysis resistance than homopolymer POM.
Common Scenarios: Use in hot water environments, steam sterilization, contact with acid/alkali environments.
Solutions:
Problem: In high-temperature water or acid/alkali environments, POM molecular chains hydrolyze and break, leading to performance degradation. Copolymer POM has better hydrolysis resistance than homopolymer POM.
Common Scenarios: Use in hot water environments, steam sterilization, contact with acid/alkali environments.
Solutions:
| Direction | Specific Practices |
| Materials | Select hydrolysis-resistant copolymer POM |
| Materials | Avoid using homopolymer POM (poor hydrolysis resistance) |
| Design | Avoid prolonged high-temperature water environments |
| Design | Avoid contact with strong acids and alkalis |
| Design | Add a protective layer or coating |
| Use | Control operating temperature and time |
| Use | Regular inspection and replacement |
5. Creep Deformation
Problem: POM slowly deforms under long-term constant load, eventually leading to dimensional deviations or failure. Creep is more pronounced at high temperatures.
Common Scenarios: Deformation of structural components under long-term load, loosening of fasteners, failure of seals.
Solutions:
Problem: POM slowly deforms under long-term constant load, eventually leading to dimensional deviations or failure. Creep is more pronounced at high temperatures.
Common Scenarios: Deformation of structural components under long-term load, loosening of fasteners, failure of seals.
Solutions:
| Direction | Specific Practices |
| Materials | Select high molecular weight/high rigidity grades |
| Materials | Glass fiber reinforced POM (significantly improves creep resistance) |
| Design | Increase wall thickness and reinforcing ribs |
| Design | Design according to creep limit, reduce stress level |
| Design | Consider long-term creep coefficient |
| Use | Avoid prolonged high temperature environments |
| Use | Regular inspection and tightening |
6. Stress Cracking/Notch Fracture
Problem: POM is very sensitive to notches and stress concentration; stress concentration at notches leads to cracking or fracture.
Common Scenarios: Fracture at sharp corners, cracking due to assembly stress, impact fracture at notches.
How to solve it:
Problem: POM is very sensitive to notches and stress concentration; stress concentration at notches leads to cracking or fracture.
Common Scenarios: Fracture at sharp corners, cracking due to assembly stress, impact fracture at notches.
How to solve it:
| Direction | Specific Practices |
| Materials | Select high-impact grade POM (toughened modification) |
| Materials | High molecular weight POM (better toughness) |
| Design | Enlarge fillet radius (R≥0.5mm, the larger the better) |
| Design | Avoid sharp corners and notches |
| Design | Reduce stress concentration factor |
| Design | Reduce assembly stress |
| Process | Optimize molding process to reduce internal stress |
| Process | Annealing treatment to eliminate internal stress |
Last article:Mold Temperature Controller Selection
Next article:Return list
Recommended
Related
- Plastics Materials (Part 10): In-depth Analysis of POM (Polyoxymethylene)11-07
- Mold Temperature Controller Selection11-06
- Injection Molding Core Process Parameter Setting and Optimization Logic11-06
- Plastic Materials (Part 9): In-depth Analysis of PEHD & PMMA11-05
- Six Common Injection Molding Machine Faults and Troubleshooting Methods (Workshop Practical Solution11-04




