Core Basis and Implementation Standards for Mold Design
Time:2026-06-26 08:17:39 / Popularity: / Source:
Design Iron Rule: Customer drawings and samples are the only legal basis for mold design, and all technical decisions must be based on them. Following is a systematic design implementation framework:
I. Standard Process for Product Analysis
I. Standard Process for Product Analysis
1. Dimensional Accuracy Implementation Specifications
| Product Type | Allowable Deviation | Detection Tool | Disposal Method |
| Toys | Assembly Dimension ±0.1mm | Caliper | Non-critical Dimension Retention Matching |
| Precision Structural Parts | All Dimensions ±0.02mm | Coordinate Measuring Machine | Reserved Shrinkage Compensation |
| Appearance Parts | Visible Surface ±0.05mm | Contour Projector | Mold Polishing Direction Matching Texture |
Note: Shrinkage Selection Formula: S_Actual = S_Nominal + α·ΔT·L
(α: Plastic Expansion Coefficient, such as PP takes 9×10⁻⁵/℃)
II. Key Technical Points of Product Characteristics
1. Demolding angle design matrix
(α: Plastic Expansion Coefficient, such as PP takes 9×10⁻⁵/℃)
II. Key Technical Points of Product Characteristics
1. Demolding angle design matrix
| Plastic type | Minimum demolding angle | Recommended design value | Special requirements |
| ABS | 0.5° | 1°-1.5° | Add 0.5° for textured surface |
| POM | 0.3° | 0.8°-1.2° | Add 1° when containing 15% glass fiber |
| PC | 0.7° | 1.2°-2° | Transparent parts require gradual demolding angle |
2. Wall thickness balance control
Golden ratio:
■ Base wall thickness = 0.6×flow length ratio×material coefficient
■ Reinforcement rib = 0.6×main wall thickness
■ Corner R angle = 0.3×wall thickness
Testing standard:
► Ultrasonic thickness gauge scanning tolerance ±0.05mm
► CAE mold flow analysis shear rate <10000s⁻¹
III. Material decision tree
graph LR
A[Plastic type] --> B{Characteristics}
B -->|High wear| C[Carbide insert]
B -->|High glass fiber| D[Chrome plating/DLC coating]
B -->|Corrosive| E[Corrosion-resistant steel]
A --> F[Batch]
F -->|>500,000| G[Pre-hardened steel + TD treatment]
F -->|<100,000| H[Ordinary P20 steel]
Quick reference for mold steel selection:
Golden ratio:
■ Base wall thickness = 0.6×flow length ratio×material coefficient
■ Reinforcement rib = 0.6×main wall thickness
■ Corner R angle = 0.3×wall thickness
Testing standard:
► Ultrasonic thickness gauge scanning tolerance ±0.05mm
► CAE mold flow analysis shear rate <10000s⁻¹
III. Material decision tree
graph LR
A[Plastic type] --> B{Characteristics}
B -->|High wear| C[Carbide insert]
B -->|High glass fiber| D[Chrome plating/DLC coating]
B -->|Corrosive| E[Corrosion-resistant steel]
A --> F[Batch]
F -->|>500,000| G[Pre-hardened steel + TD treatment]
F -->|<100,000| H[Ordinary P20 steel]
Quick reference for mold steel selection:
| Plastic | Recommended steel | Heat treatment | Life guarantee |
| PP/PE | NAK80 | HRC40-42 | 500,000 molds |
| ABS/PC | S136 | HRC48-52 | 800,000 molds |
| PPS/LCP | H13+surface nitriding | HV1100 | 1 million molds |
IV. Batch production response plan
Mold cavity number calculation model
Optimal cavity number N = min(
⌊T_max/(t_cycle+t_aux)⌋,
⌊F_clamp/(P_inj×A_part)⌋,
⌊W_max/(W_part+W_runner)⌋)
Parameter description:
T_max: Daily production time (seconds)
t_cycle: Single piece cycle
F_clamp: Injection molding machine clamping force
A_part: Single piece projection area
Case: 10-hour production plan, 8-second cycle, 1000T injection molding machine
→ N = min(45000/8, 1000/(30 * 0.05)) = min(32,66) = 32 holes
V. Injection molding machine matching list
Mold cavity number calculation model
Optimal cavity number N = min(
⌊T_max/(t_cycle+t_aux)⌋,
⌊F_clamp/(P_inj×A_part)⌋,
⌊W_max/(W_part+W_runner)⌋)
Parameter description:
T_max: Daily production time (seconds)
t_cycle: Single piece cycle
F_clamp: Injection molding machine clamping force
A_part: Single piece projection area
Case: 10-hour production plan, 8-second cycle, 1000T injection molding machine
→ N = min(45000/8, 1000/(30 * 0.05)) = min(32,66) = 32 holes
V. Injection molding machine matching list
| Parameters | Verification formula | Safety factor | Adjustment plan |
| Clamping force | F > 1.3×P_inj×A_total | ≥15% | Increase mold plate support column |
| Injection volume | V_max > 1.2×V_total | ≥20% | Optimize runner diameter |
| Ejection stroke | S_ej > H_part+20mm | ≥10mm | Increase ejector plate stroke |
| Pull rod spacing | L > L_mold+100mm | ≥50mm | Split mold plate design |
VI. Implementation specifications for special needs
Electroplating mold design
Technical points:
► Runner system: H-type layout (auxiliary runner width 4mm)
► Gate design: latent gate + cold material hole
► Separation scheme: pre-break line (depth 0.3×wall thickness)
Notes:
■ Laser cutting separation is required after electroplating
■ Stress analysis is required for pre-break point
Surface treatment process selection
Electroplating mold design
Technical points:
► Runner system: H-type layout (auxiliary runner width 4mm)
► Gate design: latent gate + cold material hole
► Separation scheme: pre-break line (depth 0.3×wall thickness)
Notes:
■ Laser cutting separation is required after electroplating
■ Stress analysis is required for pre-break point
Surface treatment process selection
| Requirements | Mold treatment process | Surface roughness | Implementation method |
| High gloss | Mirror polishing | Ra≤0.01μm | Diamond paste + ultrasonic polishing |
| Matte surface | EDM bite | VDI3400-B grade | Compound discharge pattern |
| Leather pattern | Laser etching | Rz 50μm | 3D texture mapping |
VII. Design verification list
Dimension traceability system
Two-way verification of key dimensions and drawings (tolerance ±0.002mm)
Sample 3D scanning comparison (deviation chromatogram)
Molding simulation prediction
CAE must-check items:
□ Weld line position prediction
□ Shrinkage index <0.05
□ Ejection stress <30% of material yield strength
Design risk matrix
Dimension traceability system
Two-way verification of key dimensions and drawings (tolerance ±0.002mm)
Sample 3D scanning comparison (deviation chromatogram)
Molding simulation prediction
CAE must-check items:
□ Weld line position prediction
□ Shrinkage index <0.05
□ Ejection stress <30% of material yield strength
Design risk matrix
| Risk level | Judgment standard | Countermeasures |
| Red | Interference or unable to demold | Redesign motion mechanism |
| Orange | Life not up to standard | Material upgrade + strengthening treatment |
| Yellow | Exceeding current machine capacity | Add outsourcing process plan |
Final confirmation: After obtaining written approval from customer, mold is opened, and first piece needs to undergo a full dimensional inspection report (CPK≥1.33)
This specification can ensure that mold design has a one-time pass rate of >95%, and number of mold trials is ≤3 times, meeting development needs of various industrial products.
This specification can ensure that mold design has a one-time pass rate of >95%, and number of mold trials is ≤3 times, meeting development needs of various industrial products.
Last article:Regarding Improving Glass Fiber Exposure in Glass Fiber-Reinforced Injection Molding
Next article:Return list
Recommended
Related
- Core Basis and Implementation Standards for Mold Design06-26
- Regarding Improving Glass Fiber Exposure in Glass Fiber-Reinforced Injection Molding06-26
- Practical Guide to Initiation and Requirements Management of Plastic Parts Projects: Refined Control06-25
- Research on Die-Casting Process of Aluminum Alloy Automobile Shock Towers06-24
- Mold Design Guide (Runnerless Molding Molds)06-24
